| Glitch with the draft | |
|
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
SoxNats0 Guest
| Subject: Glitch with the draft 6/25/2007, 10:24 am | |
| Ok, so i was updating the draft order and everything, when I saw this: #110 pick - Oakland (from New England, San Francisco) *Randy Moss*
We all know New England traded the #110 pick to Oakland for Randy Moss. But since I'm a Patriots fan, I remembered the other trade:
New England trades picks #28 to San Francisco for #110 and a 2008 first rounder. San Francisco went on to select Joe Staley. We have said we are not doing trades with picks only, but if we are not doing trades with picks only, then #110 should be San Francisco's, since #28 is New England's, right? But if #110 is San Fransisco's, then New England couldn't have traded #110 to Oakland and therefore Randy Moss plays for Oakland.
If you don't understand this, contact me and I can explain it in further detail |
|
| |
coolman4721
Number of posts : 135 Registration date : 2007-06-24
| Subject: Re: Glitch with the draft 6/25/2007, 10:27 am | |
| So we could either give #28 to san fran, or send Randy Moss back to Oakland? | |
|
| |
SoxNats0 Guest
| Subject: Re: Glitch with the draft 6/25/2007, 10:30 am | |
| - coolman4721 wrote:
- So we could either give #28 to san fran, or send Randy Moss back to Oakland?
its a bit more complicated than that, but thats the basic gist of it. if we gave #28 to SF, we'd have to give #22 to cleveland, etc. |
|
| |
RpAaVtEs Guest
| Subject: Re: Glitch with the draft 6/25/2007, 11:36 am | |
| yah, I saw that when I was making the order but I really didnt think it was a big deal...I mean just ask the 9ers, if they want to make a fuss about it then go ahead if not then keep it. |
|
| |
SoxNats0 Guest
| Subject: Re: Glitch with the draft 6/25/2007, 11:42 am | |
| - Patstown wrote:
- yah, I saw that when I was making the order but I really didnt think it was a big deal...I mean just ask the 9ers, if they want to make a fuss about it then go ahead if not then keep it.
cuz the pats will have their 1st next year too.... i think we should include all trades. |
|
| |
RpAaVtEs Guest
| Subject: Re: Glitch with the draft 6/25/2007, 12:23 pm | |
| They wont have the 9ers first next year...the only part of the pick 28 trade that happend was the 4th rounder b.c it needed to for the Moss trade. the 9ers are losing a 4th rounder and thats it...if they want it then they can have it but it would be a pain....if they dont care, then just leave it. |
|
| |
SoxNats0 Guest
| Subject: Re: Glitch with the draft 6/25/2007, 12:24 pm | |
| yeah they will, they'll put it in madden |
|
| |
RpAaVtEs Guest
| Subject: Re: Glitch with the draft 6/25/2007, 12:26 pm | |
| so we give it back to them? no big deal. |
|
| |
RpAaVtEs Guest
| Subject: Re: Glitch with the draft 6/25/2007, 12:26 pm | |
| its a one year thing anyhow |
|
| |
SoxNats0 Guest
| Subject: Re: Glitch with the draft 6/25/2007, 12:27 pm | |
| |
|
| |
nieemo
Number of posts : 226 Registration date : 2007-06-21
| Subject: Re: Glitch with the draft 6/25/2007, 1:18 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
dreamteam
Number of posts : 183 Registration date : 2007-06-22
| Subject: Re: Glitch with the draft 6/25/2007, 3:18 pm | |
| so would i b gettin #28 or #110? | |
|
| |
RpAaVtEs Guest
| Subject: Re: Glitch with the draft 6/25/2007, 3:26 pm | |
| you won't be getting #28, but if you really want #110 its going to be a real pain b.c then a couple other players and picks will have to be re-done |
|
| |
yayanjl Admin
Number of posts : 252 Age : 30 Location : Northwestern Wisconsin Registration date : 2007-04-13
| Subject: Re: Glitch with the draft 6/25/2007, 3:27 pm | |
| If anything I can give Dreamteam picks 172 and 182 from me. Its not a big deal. | |
|
| |
catspajamas
Number of posts : 108 Age : 33 Location : CT Registration date : 2007-06-22
| Subject: Re: Glitch with the draft 6/25/2007, 3:29 pm | |
| thats gay, if pats got 110, then he should get 28, cause that traade was the key to the moss deal. he gets 28, and pats get 110, and if they dont get 28, y shoudl pats get moss?? this is retarded | |
|
| |
RpAaVtEs Guest
| Subject: Re: Glitch with the draft 6/25/2007, 3:31 pm | |
| cuz 110 is nothing, who cares |
|
| |
yayanjl Admin
Number of posts : 252 Age : 30 Location : Northwestern Wisconsin Registration date : 2007-04-13
| Subject: Re: Glitch with the draft 6/25/2007, 3:31 pm | |
| Yeah, this is a one year league at the moment so 110 could get you a 60 rated players. | |
|
| |
catspajamas
Number of posts : 108 Age : 33 Location : CT Registration date : 2007-06-22
| Subject: Re: Glitch with the draft 6/25/2007, 3:32 pm | |
| it matters alot if the pats got moss out of it, moss is 95 at least, so its only fair that if pats get 100(which is moss) then 49s get 28 | |
|
| |
RpAaVtEs Guest
| Subject: Re: Glitch with the draft 6/25/2007, 3:34 pm | |
| we would have to do allllll the draft day trades then....Who cares! its a 4th round pick! |
|
| |
yayanjl Admin
Number of posts : 252 Age : 30 Location : Northwestern Wisconsin Registration date : 2007-04-13
| Subject: Re: Glitch with the draft 6/25/2007, 3:35 pm | |
| Give the #28th pick to the 49ers. | |
|
| |
RpAaVtEs Guest
| Subject: Re: Glitch with the draft 6/25/2007, 3:37 pm | |
| right, cuz thats fair, the 9ers are getting a 1st round pick for a 4th round pick and an 08 first rounder....o yah its a one year league so they are getting #28 for #110. It makes much more sense to just forget about the stupid 4th rounder
Last edited by on 6/25/2007, 3:39 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| |
dreamteam
Number of posts : 183 Registration date : 2007-06-22
| Subject: Re: Glitch with the draft 6/25/2007, 3:39 pm | |
| i hope its more than one year | |
|
| |
yayanjl Admin
Number of posts : 252 Age : 30 Location : Northwestern Wisconsin Registration date : 2007-04-13
| Subject: Re: Glitch with the draft 6/25/2007, 3:39 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
dreamteam
Number of posts : 183 Registration date : 2007-06-22
| Subject: Re: Glitch with the draft 6/25/2007, 3:39 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
RpAaVtEs Guest
| Subject: Re: Glitch with the draft 6/25/2007, 3:40 pm | |
| do you really care about the 4th rounder dream? |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Glitch with the draft | |
| |
|
| |
| Glitch with the draft | |
|