| Giants/Ravens trade (approved) | |
|
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
RpAaVtEs Guest
| Subject: Re: Giants/Ravens trade (approved) 6/26/2007, 11:06 pm | |
| How is this deal not good? its madden not real life simply put Rolle>webster Mcgahee>Jacobs Plax>#1 pick |
|
| |
daBEARS Guest
| Subject: Re: Giants/Ravens trade (approved) 6/26/2007, 11:06 pm | |
| its madden. you go by ratings. willis will be rated much higher than jacobs its easy as that |
|
| |
mksadng Guest
| Subject: Re: Giants/Ravens trade (approved) 6/26/2007, 11:07 pm | |
| Ok i was offered a whole draft for Wayne and all he has to do is give up a FA pick this deal is lopsided and if this is more then 1 year Giants are getting owned because Rolle SUCKED this year and will be horrible next year as well and madden will drop him in ratings significantly |
|
| |
RpAaVtEs Guest
| Subject: Re: Giants/Ravens trade (approved) 6/26/2007, 11:07 pm | |
| Seriously its just number man, it doesnt matter what the names are...simply numbers |
|
| |
daBEARS Guest
| Subject: Re: Giants/Ravens trade (approved) 6/26/2007, 11:07 pm | |
| plus burress only went up a little in tds and down in everything else his rating will drop a tad |
|
| |
RpAaVtEs Guest
| Subject: Re: Giants/Ravens trade (approved) 6/26/2007, 11:08 pm | |
| and webster is yet to have a year close to Rolles best.... |
|
| |
DC Guest
| Subject: Re: Giants/Ravens trade (approved) 6/26/2007, 11:08 pm | |
| - daBEARS wrote:
- plus burress only went up a little in tds and down in everything else his rating will drop a tad
His ratings wont drop. He will be the same or higher. He wont get Points docked for have a few less yards but more TDs |
|
| |
RpAaVtEs Guest
| Subject: Re: Giants/Ravens trade (approved) 6/26/2007, 11:08 pm | |
| Plax was only a 90 last year and dropped in everthing but TDs, its not like hes a 96 or anything |
|
| |
RpAaVtEs Guest
| Subject: Re: Giants/Ravens trade (approved) 6/26/2007, 11:11 pm | |
| So whats going on with this.. |
|
| |
cav_fan2
Number of posts : 115 Age : 42 Location : Huntington, WV Registration date : 2007-06-22
| Subject: Re: Giants/Ravens trade (approved) 6/26/2007, 11:12 pm | |
| You guys are beating this one waaayyy too hard...its not like either team is all of a sudden the supreme team of this league...they arent stacking a team or anything...
Ravens lose a great RB in McGahee, while the G-men lose a great WR in Burress...why dont we do this in a different light...
McGahee=Burress Rolle>=Webster (for the sake of arguing) #1 FA=Jacobs (still hasnt proved he can carry a full load)
I dont understand why this is such a problem for you guys...its not lopsided at all...its a pretty fair deal for both teams | |
|
| |
rmanrun21
Number of posts : 40 Registration date : 2007-06-26
| Subject: i agree 6/26/2007, 11:13 pm | |
| i agreed with the trade but is it on or not? | |
|
| |
RpAaVtEs Guest
| Subject: Re: Giants/Ravens trade (approved) 6/26/2007, 11:14 pm | |
| yah, Mcgahee and Plax were both 90s last year and RB is a more important pos. |
|
| |
dreamteam
Number of posts : 183 Registration date : 2007-06-22
| Subject: Re: Giants/Ravens trade (approved) 6/26/2007, 11:14 pm | |
| i agree wit cavs i think this is a pretty fair deal | |
|
| |
daBEARS Guest
| Subject: Re: Giants/Ravens trade (approved) 6/26/2007, 11:14 pm | |
| - cav_fan2 wrote:
- You guys are beating this one waaayyy too hard...its not like either team is all of a sudden the supreme team of this league...they arent stacking a team or anything...
Ravens lose a great RB in McGahee, while the G-men lose a great WR in Burress...why dont we do this in a different light...
McGahee=Burress Rolle>=Webster (for the sake of arguing) #1 FA=Jacobs (still hasnt proved he can carry a full load)
I dont understand why this is such a problem for you guys...its not lopsided at all...its a pretty fair deal for both teams perfecto |
|
| |
RpAaVtEs Guest
| Subject: Re: Giants/Ravens trade (approved) 6/26/2007, 11:14 pm | |
| Most ppl seem to agree and the Giants Still Agree, it should be approved |
|
| |
mksadng Guest
| Subject: Re: Giants/Ravens trade (approved) 6/26/2007, 11:15 pm | |
| - Patstown wrote:
- yah, Mcgahee and Plax were both 90s last year and RB is a more important pos.
no its not 70 RBs do jst as good as 80 RBs in madden WR is a much more important position since they can all hardly catch anyway |
|
| |
daBEARS Guest
| Subject: Re: Giants/Ravens trade (approved) 6/26/2007, 11:15 pm | |
| cav are you on trade council in bml? |
|
| |
RpAaVtEs Guest
| Subject: Re: Giants/Ravens trade (approved) 6/26/2007, 11:15 pm | |
| - cav_fan2 wrote:
- You guys are beating this one waaayyy too hard...its not like either team is all of a sudden the supreme team of this league...they arent stacking a team or anything...
Ravens lose a great RB in McGahee, while the G-men lose a great WR in Burress...why dont we do this in a different light...
McGahee=Burress Rolle>=Webster (for the sake of arguing) #1 FA=Jacobs (still hasnt proved he can carry a full load)
I dont understand why this is such a problem for you guys...its not lopsided at all...its a pretty fair deal for both teams Yah, perfect explination cavs, thanks |
|
| |
cav_fan2
Number of posts : 115 Age : 42 Location : Huntington, WV Registration date : 2007-06-22
| Subject: Re: Giants/Ravens trade (approved) 6/26/2007, 11:15 pm | |
| I dont want to ruffle any feathers, so I will wait for another Mod to agree first... | |
|
| |
cav_fan2
Number of posts : 115 Age : 42 Location : Huntington, WV Registration date : 2007-06-22
| Subject: Re: Giants/Ravens trade (approved) 6/26/2007, 11:16 pm | |
| - daBEARS wrote:
- cav are you on trade council in bml?
Yeah, bears....I am *edit* Wrong league bro...no Im not..wish I was...but I didnt make the cut I guess! | |
|
| |
daBEARS Guest
| Subject: Re: Giants/Ravens trade (approved) 6/26/2007, 11:17 pm | |
| - cav_fan2 wrote:
- daBEARS wrote:
- cav are you on trade council in bml?
Yeah, bears....I am
*edit* Wrong league bro...no Im not..wish I was...but I didnt make the cut I guess! in bml? my league? EDIT - welcome to the club my friend you explained this trade perfectly. you should of commented more on trades in BML. finally someone that doesnt look to deny trades right away
Last edited by on 6/26/2007, 11:18 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| |
RpAaVtEs Guest
| Subject: Re: Giants/Ravens trade (approved) 6/26/2007, 11:18 pm | |
| well ur very good at disecting trades and coming up with explinations |
|
| |
cav_fan2
Number of posts : 115 Age : 42 Location : Huntington, WV Registration date : 2007-06-22
| Subject: Re: Giants/Ravens trade (approved) 6/26/2007, 11:18 pm | |
| - daBEARS wrote:
- cav_fan2 wrote:
- daBEARS wrote:
- cav are you on trade council in bml?
Yeah, bears....I am
*edit* Wrong league bro...no Im not..wish I was...but I didnt make the cut I guess! in bml? my league? No Im not bro...Im not a Mod in that one...I edited my post...I thought you were talking about something else | |
|
| |
RpAaVtEs Guest
| Subject: Re: Giants/Ravens trade (approved) 6/26/2007, 11:19 pm | |
| Cav, you explained it perfect, the giants still agree and no1 is arguing anymore...can you approve it? |
|
| |
daBEARS Guest
| Subject: Re: Giants/Ravens trade (approved) 6/26/2007, 11:21 pm | |
| yeah dude well i put you on it now. you shouldve put more of your knowledge in trades. you explained this one pefectly. youre deff on it now. |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Giants/Ravens trade (approved) | |
| |
|
| |
| Giants/Ravens trade (approved) | |
|