| Rams/Jags(approved) | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
Emmitt22 Guest
| Subject: Rams/Jags(approved) 7/1/2007, 12:34 pm | |
| Rams Get: M.Stroud, 4th round 113 (rookie) , and 5th round 150 (rookie)
Jags get: 3rd overall pick, Ron Bartell
Rams Agree
Last edited by on 7/1/2007, 12:50 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| |
SoxNats0 Guest
| Subject: Re: Rams/Jags(approved) 7/1/2007, 12:35 pm | |
| No way. Stroud is WAY better than #3. This isnt happening. |
|
| |
daddie71 Guest
| Subject: Re: Rams/Jags(approved) 7/1/2007, 12:50 pm | |
| Reworked: Jags get #3 Rookie pick Ron Bartell
Rams get Marcus Stroud Rookie Picks 113 150
I agree |
|
| |
Emmitt22 Guest
| Subject: Re: Rams/Jags(approved) 7/1/2007, 12:51 pm | |
| |
|
| |
SoxNats0 Guest
| Subject: Re: Rams/Jags(approved) 7/1/2007, 1:14 pm | |
| - daddie7120 wrote:
- Reworked:
Jags get #3 Rookie pick Ron Bartell
Rams get Marcus Stroud Rookie Picks 113 150
I agree hmm i still think jags are getting cheated |
|
| |
coolman4721
Number of posts : 135 Registration date : 2007-06-24
| Subject: Re: Rams/Jags(approved) 7/1/2007, 1:21 pm | |
| Stroud is IMO top 3 DTs in the NFL... how is he going this cheap? | |
|
| |
Emmitt22 Guest
| Subject: Re: Rams/Jags(approved) 7/1/2007, 1:21 pm | |
| how we both agree and think its fair |
|
| |
daddie71 Guest
| Subject: Re: Rams/Jags(approved) 7/1/2007, 1:30 pm | |
| I have had stroud on the block for over a week and havent recieved any offer close to this. I get a Saftey I need (had 3 picks in limited play) and a top 3 pick which could be the bestplayer in the draft. 89 or 90. Stroud is great but come on he played 11 games last season and had like 26 tackles. Hes only had 3.5 sacks over the last 2 years. He will not be a 97 next season. Top 3 is WAY too high. |
|
| |
daddie71 Guest
| Subject: Re: Rams/Jags(approved) 7/1/2007, 1:35 pm | |
| Sox is disagreeing because he wants stroud and coolman is unhappy emmitt wouldnt trade #3 for hampton. Hampton has the same rating as stroud in madden anyway. This is killing me all the fuss anytime I have tried to trade stroud. He is going into his 7th season and declining. You guys say we need to relax on trades then come on this will make my team better weather you like the trade or not. |
|
| |
SoxNats0 Guest
| Subject: Re: Rams/Jags(approved) 7/1/2007, 1:37 pm | |
| - daddie7120 wrote:
- Sox is disagreeing because he wants stroud and coolman is unhappy emmitt wouldnt trade #3 for hampton. Hampton has the same rating as stroud in madden anyway. This is killing me all the fuss anytime I have tried to trade stroud. He is going into his 7th season and declining. You guys say we need to relax on trades then come on this will make my team better weather you like the trade or not.
I actually am not interested in Stroud, I only asked about him and never pursued it. |
|
| |
SoxNats0 Guest
| Subject: Re: Rams/Jags(approved) 7/1/2007, 1:38 pm | |
| - daddie7120 wrote:
- I have had stroud on the block for over a week and havent recieved any offer close to this. I get a Saftey I need (had 3 picks in limited play) and a top 3 pick which could be the bestplayer in the draft. 89 or 90. Stroud is great but come on he played 11 games last season and had like 26 tackles. Hes only had 3.5 sacks over the last 2 years. He will not be a 97 next season. Top 3 is WAY too high.
the best your gonna get at #3 is an 86... and thats if your lucky |
|
| |
coolman4721
Number of posts : 135 Registration date : 2007-06-24
| Subject: Re: Rams/Jags(approved) 7/1/2007, 1:39 pm | |
| whatever, i dont really care anymore. | |
|
| |
Emmitt22 Guest
| Subject: Re: Rams/Jags(approved) 7/1/2007, 1:42 pm | |
| Lets just see what the trade mods think okay? |
|
| |
daddie71 Guest
| Subject: Re: Rams/Jags(approved) 7/1/2007, 1:48 pm | |
| the best your gonna get at #3 is an 86... and thats if your lucky Ok say I get lucky and get that 86 by mid season he could be a 92... thats a 92 and Bartell would start for me very weak at FS. And Bartell would be in my opinion around 85 at seasons start. Thats a 92 and an 85(starter) for a 95 DT. Stroud is still kinda young but hasnt had 50 tackles in any season. He is not even my best Dt see John Henderson. Could someone plz approve this trade. Heck Lebron suggested to trade even up for #3. This league is losing the fun. I want to trade Stroud do I need to get Tom Brady for him?? |
|
| |
mksadng Guest
| Subject: Re: Rams/Jags(approved) 7/1/2007, 1:55 pm | |
| I love how in everyones trades they say o that rookie will be a 92 by seasons end but in everyone elses trade they say its an 86. This is a very fair trade get over it. I wanted the #3 pick but im not gunna complain because someone else got it. |
|
| |
Emmitt22 Guest
| Subject: Re: Rams/Jags(approved) 7/1/2007, 2:02 pm | |
| at least sumone understands and daddie Stroud had like 63-64 tackles in 03 |
|
| |
SoxNats0 Guest
| |
| |
SoxNats0 Guest
| Subject: Re: Rams/Jags(approved) 7/1/2007, 2:18 pm | |
| actually, looking at stroud's stats how did he get such a high rating? anyway, this is fine in my eyes |
|
| |
Emmitt22 Guest
| Subject: Re: Rams/Jags(approved) 7/1/2007, 2:19 pm | |
| still though he is proally going to be liek an 95-96 overall |
|
| |
RpAaVtEs Guest
| Subject: Re: Rams/Jags(approved) 7/1/2007, 2:19 pm | |
| b.c stats don't tell the whole story, Stroud has been a dominant DT for a while but his stats don't neccesarily show that...and DTs don't have pretty stats anyways...but this deal looks fine...and if Daddy has had a player on the block for 2 weeks and this is the best deal he can get then he has the right to be able to trade him. |
|
| |
Emmitt22 Guest
| Subject: Re: Rams/Jags(approved) 7/1/2007, 2:35 pm | |
| |
|
| |
mksadng Guest
| Subject: Re: Rams/Jags(approved) 7/1/2007, 2:39 pm | |
| exactly Richard Seymours stats make him look like a backup but hes the best 3-4 DE in the league IMO |
|
| |
Touchdow Guest
| Subject: Re: Rams/Jags(approved) 7/1/2007, 5:38 pm | |
| this trade is perfectly fine, I dont know why you people are going crazy over Stroud being worth more than the 3rd pick. If a ~90 WR can go for the 6th pick (housh) then a ~95 DT can easilly go for the 3rd pick |
|
| |
SoxNats0 Guest
| Subject: Re: Rams/Jags(approved) 7/1/2007, 5:39 pm | |
| - lebronzoom wrote:
- this trade is perfectly fine, I dont know why you people are going crazy over Stroud being worth more than the 3rd pick. If a ~90 WR can go for the 6th pick (housh) then a ~95 DT can easilly go for the 3rd pick
i know, i retracted my argument. |
|
| |
daddie71 Guest
| Subject: Re: Rams/Jags(approved) 7/1/2007, 5:39 pm | |
| could someone approve this so I can edit my roster? Thanks |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Rams/Jags(approved) | |
| |
|
| |
| Rams/Jags(approved) | |
|