| Giants/Pats (approved) | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
rmanrun21
Number of posts : 40 Registration date : 2007-06-26
| Subject: Giants/Pats (approved) 7/2/2007, 7:38 pm | |
| Pats Get 51 116
Giants Get curry(81) 225 227 | |
|
| |
Silvabil Guest
| Subject: Re: Giants/Pats (approved) 7/2/2007, 7:39 pm | |
| |
|
| |
Silvabil Guest
| Subject: Re: Giants/Pats (approved) 7/2/2007, 7:44 pm | |
| |
|
| |
SoxNats0 Guest
| Subject: Re: Giants/Pats (approved) 7/2/2007, 7:45 pm | |
| Hmm, I'm slightly iffy on this one. The difference between the picks alone is 631.4, which equals roughly the #29 pick... I do not think Curry: #29. I will let some other mods give input though. If someone can convince me he does, I will approve this.
Last edited by on 7/2/2007, 7:46 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| |
nieemo
Number of posts : 226 Registration date : 2007-06-21
| Subject: Re: Giants/Pats (approved) 7/2/2007, 7:45 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
Silvabil Guest
| Subject: Re: Giants/Pats (approved) 7/2/2007, 7:48 pm | |
| well if you think about need too the giants GM really needs a WR which seem to be extremly hard to get....also curry is still really young and was prob one of the lon bright spots on the raider offence |
|
| |
nieemo
Number of posts : 226 Registration date : 2007-06-21
| Subject: Re: Giants/Pats (approved) 7/2/2007, 7:51 pm | |
| giants should take oyt 1 pick | |
|
| |
SoxNats0 Guest
| Subject: Re: Giants/Pats (approved) 7/2/2007, 7:52 pm | |
| If Giants take out #81 i will approve this. |
|
| |
Silvabil Guest
| Subject: Re: Giants/Pats (approved) 7/2/2007, 7:53 pm | |
| |
|
| |
nieemo
Number of posts : 226 Registration date : 2007-06-21
| Subject: Re: Giants/Pats (approved) 7/2/2007, 7:54 pm | |
| take out 81 and this will be fair | |
|
| |
SoxNats0 Guest
| Subject: Re: Giants/Pats (approved) 7/2/2007, 7:54 pm | |
| - SoxNats07 wrote:
- If Giants take out #81 i will approve this.
81, not 116. that seems fairer. |
|
| |
Touchdow Guest
| Subject: Re: Giants/Pats (approved) 7/2/2007, 7:54 pm | |
| yea those two seventh rounders are basically worth nothing, the players wont even be in the game. Take out 81 and its fair |
|
| |
Silvabil Guest
| Subject: Re: Giants/Pats (approved) 7/2/2007, 7:56 pm | |
| fine...pick 81(tony hunt) is out:( |
|
| |
SoxNats0 Guest
| Subject: Re: Giants/Pats (approved) 7/2/2007, 7:57 pm | |
| |
|
| |
dreamteam
Number of posts : 183 Registration date : 2007-06-22
| Subject: Re: Giants/Pats (approved) 7/2/2007, 7:57 pm | |
| - lebronzoom wrote:
- yea those two seventh rounders are basically worth nothing, the players wont even be in the game. Take out 81 and its fair
why does evryone say this..san fran selected melvin oliver in the 6th round last year and he was in the game at the start and was rated 74 | |
|
| |
Touchdow Guest
| Subject: Re: Giants/Pats (approved) 7/2/2007, 7:57 pm | |
| |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Giants/Pats (approved) | |
| |
|
| |
| Giants/Pats (approved) | |
|