| Redskins and Bills trade(approved) | |
|
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
SoxNats0 Guest
| Subject: Redskins and Bills trade(approved) 7/7/2007, 7:33 pm | |
| Bills get: #46 rookie pick, pick #101
Redskins get: Ryan Denney, #51 rookie pick
Redskins agree |
|
| |
joutman
Number of posts : 45 Registration date : 2007-06-25
| Subject: Re: Redskins and Bills trade(approved) 7/7/2007, 7:34 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
Touchdow Guest
| Subject: Re: Redskins and Bills trade(approved) 7/7/2007, 7:34 pm | |
| I dunno about this, Denneys pretty good an those two picks are only 5 off. |
|
| |
SoxNats0 Guest
| Subject: Re: Redskins and Bills trade(approved) 7/7/2007, 7:35 pm | |
| - Touchdown Jesus! wrote:
- I dunno about this, Denneys pretty good an those two picks are only 5 off.
denney is a backup DE... anyway, remember what DC said about approving trades? |
|
| |
mksadng Guest
| Subject: Re: Redskins and Bills trade(approved) 7/7/2007, 7:35 pm | |
| Ya i dont think it should get approved |
|
| |
SoxNats0 Guest
| Subject: Re: Redskins and Bills trade(approved) 7/7/2007, 7:35 pm | |
| - mksadng wrote:
- Ya i dont think it should get approved
Mksadng is saying that because he wants my pick... |
|
| |
RpAaVtEs Guest
| Subject: Re: Redskins and Bills trade(approved) 7/7/2007, 7:35 pm | |
| - SoxNats07 wrote:
- Touchdown Jesus! wrote:
- I dunno about this, Denneys pretty good an those two picks are only 5 off.
denney is a backup DE... anyway, remember what DC said about approving trades? well do you know why DC said that, lol |
|
| |
Touchdow Guest
| Subject: Re: Redskins and Bills trade(approved) 7/7/2007, 7:36 pm | |
| its 5 picks off! thats equal to like a 4th or 5th rounder and Denny is better than a 4th. I dont like it sox your gonna have to throw something else in |
|
| |
mksadng Guest
| Subject: Re: Redskins and Bills trade(approved) 7/7/2007, 7:36 pm | |
| I dont want ur pick UR A LIAR DENIE IT |
|
| |
SoxNats0 Guest
| Subject: Re: Redskins and Bills trade(approved) 7/7/2007, 7:37 pm | |
| - Touchdown Jesus! wrote:
- its 5 picks off! thats equal to like a 4th or 5th rounder and Denny is better than a 4th. I dont like it sox your gonna have to throw something else in
what do i have to throw in? |
|
| |
Touchdow Guest
| Subject: Re: Redskins and Bills trade(approved) 7/7/2007, 7:37 pm | |
| - SoxNats07 wrote:
- Touchdown Jesus! wrote:
- I dunno about this, Denneys pretty good an those two picks are only 5 off.
denney is a backup DE... anyway, remember what DC said about approving trades? DC said that so he could stack his team |
|
| |
SoxNats0 Guest
| Subject: Re: Redskins and Bills trade(approved) 7/7/2007, 7:38 pm | |
| - RpAaVtEsNS wrote:
- SoxNats07 wrote:
- Touchdown Jesus! wrote:
- I dunno about this, Denneys pretty good an those two picks are only 5 off.
denney is a backup DE... anyway, remember what DC said about approving trades? well do you know why DC said that, lol no, why? |
|
| |
Touchdow Guest
| Subject: Re: Redskins and Bills trade(approved) 7/7/2007, 7:38 pm | |
| |
|
| |
Touchdow Guest
| Subject: Re: Redskins and Bills trade(approved) 7/7/2007, 7:38 pm | |
| - SoxNats07 wrote:
- RpAaVtEsNS wrote:
- SoxNats07 wrote:
- Touchdown Jesus! wrote:
- I dunno about this, Denneys pretty good an those two picks are only 5 off.
denney is a backup DE... anyway, remember what DC said about approving trades? well do you know why DC said that, lol no, why? he said that so he could improve his own team |
|
| |
SoxNats0 Guest
| Subject: Re: Redskins and Bills trade(approved) 7/7/2007, 7:39 pm | |
| - Touchdown Jesus! wrote:
- throw in a late 3rd
i can add #101 if he adds #127..... thats fair for a backup DE |
|
| |
Touchdow Guest
| Subject: Re: Redskins and Bills trade(approved) 7/7/2007, 7:40 pm | |
| Denny has the capability of being a mediocre starter though, he gonna be like 84 overall.
Throw in #101 and this deal gets approved but if he throws in 127 that basically eliminates the purpose |
|
| |
SoxNats0 Guest
| Subject: Re: Redskins and Bills trade(approved) 7/7/2007, 7:41 pm | |
| - Touchdown Jesus! wrote:
- Denny has the capability of being a mediocre starter though, he gonna be like 84 overall.
Throw in #101 and this deal gets approved but if he throws in 127 that basically eliminates the purpose no, because he is moving up in the 4th...... how about this: Redskins get: Denney, #51, #127 Bills get: #46, #101, #205, #216 |
|
| |
mksadng Guest
| Subject: Re: Redskins and Bills trade(approved) 7/7/2007, 7:42 pm | |
| |
|
| |
SoxNats0 Guest
| Subject: Re: Redskins and Bills trade(approved) 7/7/2007, 7:43 pm | |
| - mksadng wrote:
- cough rip off cough
shut up MK... you just want my pick. anyway, even if this doesn't happen, i have a better offer on the table than urs so u might as well give up. |
|
| |
cav_fan2
Number of posts : 115 Age : 42 Location : Huntington, WV Registration date : 2007-06-22
| Subject: Re: Redskins and Bills trade(approved) 7/7/2007, 7:43 pm | |
| 54 tackles and 6 sacks is pretty damn good for a backup and not to shabby for a starter...
Denney can be a starter for almost all of our teams...he is worth a second rounder by himself...
This trade is wwaayy off IMO...a fourth rounder added doesnt get close to evening this deal out... | |
|
| |
Touchdow Guest
| Subject: Re: Redskins and Bills trade(approved) 7/7/2007, 7:43 pm | |
| 205 and 216 probably wont even be in madden
Denny and 51 for 46 and 101 is still tilted in your favour I dont know why you dont just settle with this. |
|
| |
SoxNats0 Guest
| Subject: Re: Redskins and Bills trade(approved) 7/7/2007, 7:44 pm | |
| - Touchdown Jesus! wrote:
- 205 and 216 probably wont even be in madden
Denny and 51 for 46 and 101 is still tilted in your favour I dont know why you dont just settle with this. fine ill do that. |
|
| |
mksadng Guest
| Subject: Re: Redskins and Bills trade(approved) 7/7/2007, 7:45 pm | |
| |
|
| |
SoxNats0 Guest
| Subject: Re: Redskins and Bills trade(approved) 7/7/2007, 7:47 pm | |
| - SoxNats07 wrote:
- Touchdown Jesus! wrote:
- 205 and 216 probably wont even be in madden
Denny and 51 for 46 and 101 is still tilted in your favour I dont know why you dont just settle with this. fine ill do that. so is this good to go? |
|
| |
Touchdow Guest
| Subject: Re: Redskins and Bills trade(approved) 7/7/2007, 7:47 pm | |
| I editted the original post, but sox man dont try to squeeze out any more than you already have and I dont appreciate it when your unwilling to give a fourth rounder even though your still clearly getting the benefit of the trade here.
I dont think Denney is worth a second round pick, an early third yes. The difference between 46 and 51 and the 101 pick probably evens out to be a late 3rd and while even though jout's still getting the worse side of this trade Id be willing to let it slide |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Redskins and Bills trade(approved) | |
| |
|
| |
| Redskins and Bills trade(approved) | |
|