| Raiders/Vikings reworked trade(Approved) | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
Touchdow Guest
| Subject: Raiders/Vikings reworked trade(Approved) 7/8/2007, 12:01 am | |
| Raiders get: Norm Katnik 75 tony Romo 87 Erasmus James 83 Fabian Washington 84
Vikings get: Jeremy Newberry 88 Charlie Frye 83 Kabeer Gbaja Biamila 86 Andre Woolfolk 76 Tyler Brayton 81
heres an explanation ahead of time incase there's controversy
Newberry, Frye=Romo, Katnik Woolfolk, Brayton=Washington KGB=James
James had a worse season than last so im not sure how much growth he actually has
Washington has potention but so do Brayton and Woolfolk
Frye=4 less than Romo Katnik=13 less than Newberry
:D
Raiders agree |
|
| |
SoxNats0 Guest
| Subject: Re: Raiders/Vikings reworked trade(Approved) 7/8/2007, 12:03 am | |
| Dude James is like a 97 in two seasons...... how does KGB equal him |
|
| |
DC Guest
| Subject: Re: Raiders/Vikings reworked trade(Approved) 7/8/2007, 12:04 am | |
| - SoxNats07 wrote:
- Dude James is like a 97 in two seasons...... how does KGB equal him
James has barely played due to injuries. He isnt even close to a 83 |
|
| |
Touchdow Guest
| Subject: Re: Raiders/Vikings reworked trade(Approved) 7/8/2007, 12:04 am | |
| How will James be a 97 in two season....
He had 2 tackles in 2 games last season, the season before he had 28 tackles and 4 sacks. Hes not THAT great. |
|
| |
Touchdow Guest
| Subject: Re: Raiders/Vikings reworked trade(Approved) 7/8/2007, 12:06 am | |
| I should also mention, this improves...
My QB, CB I get worse at RE, LE, C
Yan gets better at RE, LE, C Yan gets worse at CB (Romo will play back up for J-Roc since it would be better for him to grow) |
|
| |
yayanjl Admin
Number of posts : 252 Age : 30 Location : Northwestern Wisconsin Registration date : 2007-04-13
| Subject: Re: Raiders/Vikings reworked trade(Approved) 7/8/2007, 12:07 am | |
| I forgot to accept I agree. | |
|
| |
Touchdow Guest
| Subject: Re: Raiders/Vikings reworked trade(Approved) 7/8/2007, 12:18 am | |
| so whats happenin with this trade, am I still raping yan or what? Because nobody's really given a direct opinion |
|
| |
SoxNats0 Guest
| Subject: Re: Raiders/Vikings reworked trade(Approved) 7/8/2007, 12:21 am | |
| I gave you a sideways opinion |
|
| |
Touchdow Guest
| Subject: Re: Raiders/Vikings reworked trade(Approved) 7/8/2007, 12:22 am | |
| I thought it was more of a diagonal opinion |
|
| |
SoxNats0 Guest
| Subject: Re: Raiders/Vikings reworked trade(Approved) 7/8/2007, 12:23 am | |
| |
|
| |
Touchdow Guest
| Subject: Re: Raiders/Vikings reworked trade(Approved) 7/8/2007, 12:23 am | |
| seriously though, is this trade fair or no? |
|
| |
SoxNats0 Guest
| Subject: Re: Raiders/Vikings reworked trade(Approved) 7/8/2007, 12:25 am | |
| - Touchdown Jesus! wrote:
- seriously though, is this trade fair or no?
ill tell u if its fair IF you tell me why u made DC say jenny |
|
| |
Touchdow Guest
| Subject: Re: Raiders/Vikings reworked trade(Approved) 7/8/2007, 12:26 am | |
| I explained in the chat box |
|
| |
Touchdow Guest
| Subject: Re: Raiders/Vikings reworked trade(Approved) 7/8/2007, 12:54 am | |
| |
|
| |
yayanjl Admin
Number of posts : 252 Age : 30 Location : Northwestern Wisconsin Registration date : 2007-04-13
| Subject: Re: Raiders/Vikings reworked trade(Approved) 7/8/2007, 12:54 am | |
| | |
|
| |
DC Guest
| Subject: Re: Raiders/Vikings reworked trade(Approved) 7/8/2007, 12:56 am | |
| - yayanjl wrote:
- is this approved????
No. Im picking on Zoom right now. Hold on Yan |
|
| |
Touchdow Guest
| Subject: Re: Raiders/Vikings reworked trade(Approved) 7/8/2007, 12:56 am | |
| DC isnt approving it because I had his name in my username |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Raiders/Vikings reworked trade(Approved) | |
| |
|
| |
| Raiders/Vikings reworked trade(Approved) | |
|