Panthers and Redskins trade(cancelled)

Guest

Panthers get: Ladell Betts, R.W. McQuarters, #22 rookie pick

Redskins get: Ken Lucas

Redskins agree

Number of posts : 226 Registration date : 2007-06-21

panthers agree

Guest

People might disagree to this one, but actually its fair as Lucas went down in production last year a lot from the previous two years. Betts had 1150 yards last year, McQuarters is a solid veteran, and #22 adds a young player.

Number of posts : 226 Registration date : 2007-06-21

any objectons

Guest

actually lucas only went down in productivity last year. I dont have a problem with this trade though, lucas is kind of injury prone and hasnt proven himself as a dominant player on carolina

Guest

I like the deal and it looks fair to me I just hate SoxNats07. You no why. Sad

Guest

SBChamps wrote:: I like the deal and it looks fair to me I just hate SoxNats07. You no why.

he REALLY wanted betts... sorry man.

Number of posts : 226 Registration date : 2007-06-21

SBC i can trade him to u

Guest

SBChamps wrote:: I like the deal and it looks fair to me I just hate SoxNats07. You no why.

u never made me an offer...

Guest

So Lebron can you lock this up?

Guest

SoxNats07 wrote:: Panthers get: Ladell Betts, R.W. McQuarters, #22 rookie pick

Redskins get: Ken Lucas

Redskins agree

Yeah ok. This isnt flying. Betts is a 1000 yard Rusher. R.W and pick 22 is more than enough. Lucas went down in production, and lost his starting job to Richard Marshall last season. His value has definately gone down.

Guest

DC wrote:

SoxNats07 wrote:: Panthers get: Ladell Betts, R.W. McQuarters, #22 rookie pick

Redskins get: Ken Lucas

Redskins agree

Yeah ok. This isnt flying. Betts is a 1000 yard Rusher. R.W and pick 22 is more than enough. Lucas went down in production, and lost his starting job to Richard Marshall last season. His value has definately gone down.

Hes still a 90 CB and was rated 94 last season. Not to mention madden doesnt usually lower ratings that much after one bad season. And marshall was a beast anyway he could have beaten out a lot of capable corners for their spots

Guest

lebronzoom wrote:

DC wrote:

SoxNats07 wrote:: Panthers get: Ladell Betts, R.W. McQuarters, #22 rookie pick

Redskins get: Ken Lucas

Redskins agree

Yeah ok. This isnt flying. Betts is a 1000 yard Rusher. R.W and pick 22 is more than enough. Lucas went down in production, and lost his starting job to Richard Marshall last season. His value has definately gone down.

Hes still a 90 CB and was rated 94 last season. Not to mention madden doesnt usually lower ratings that much after one bad season. And marshall was a beast anyway he could have beaten out a lot of capable corners for their spots

I highly doubt he is a 90. Highly.

Guest

Drew what would u say is a fair trade?

Guest

SoxNats07 wrote:: Drew what would u say is a fair trade?

Taking out Betts. You all think 1000 yard Rushers grow on trees or something?

Guest

OK, so niemo would you do this:

#22 and R.W Mcquarters for Ken Lucas?

Guest

Well if you think about it, RW McQuarters always gets a bad rating despite how he plays, Betts is kind of over-rated, hes a back-up and only got 4 TD's. And the 22nd pick can get a player who will develop into maybe an 86.

Guest

lebronzoom wrote:: Well if you think about it, RW McQuarters always gets a bad rating despite how he plays, Betts is kind of over-rated, hes a back-up and only got 4 TD's. And the 22nd pick can get a player who will develop into maybe an 86.

How is Betts overrated? How is a RB that runs for a 1000 overrated? He had only 4 rushing TD's, but Wasington was Horrible on offense last season.

Number of posts : 106 Registration date : 2007-06-29

DC wrote:

SoxNats07 wrote:: Drew what would u say is a fair trade?

Taking out Betts. You all think 1000 yard Rushers grow on trees or something?

they do, given the opportunity

Guest

Or we can do Richard Marshall for #22.

Guest

PK wrote:

DC wrote:

SoxNats07 wrote:: Drew what would u say is a fair trade?

Taking out Betts. You all think 1000 yard Rushers grow on trees or something?

they do, given the opportunity

Oh really? You think so? Well look at a few RBs tha have had many chances, and have done nothing,

Ron Dayne
TJ Duckett
KiJana Carter
and the list continues

Guest

PK wrote:

DC wrote:

SoxNats07 wrote:: Drew what would u say is a fair trade?

Taking out Betts. You all think 1000 yard Rushers grow on trees or something?

they do, given the opportunity

my point exactly. He had the opportunity with Portis out of the way and didnt produce that well. He's not going to sprout just because of getting one opportunity and the prior years he didnt do so well

Guest

DC wrote:: Ron Dayne
TJ Duckett
KiJana Carter
and the list continues

And out of that list ive heard of maybe 1 (Duckett)

What are you talking about CarteR? He hasnt played a single game or gotten a single touch.

Dayne? He got close and plays behind a brutal O-Line

Duckett didnt start any games, nuff' said, and when he did start games he got 11 TD's.

Guest

lebronzoom wrote:

PK wrote:

DC wrote:

SoxNats07 wrote:: Drew what would u say is a fair trade?

Taking out Betts. You all think 1000 yard Rushers grow on trees or something?

they do, given the opportunity

my point exactly. He had the opportunity with Portis out of the way and didnt produce that well. He's not going to sprout just because of getting one opportunity and the prior years he didnt do so well

Dude he over a 1000 yards Rushing? You argument makes no sense now Zoom, and he did it in starting 9 games.. I mean, at one point he had 5 straight 100 yard games. This isn't flying no matter what. Because I just cant see the fairness here.

Guest

not to mention Betts started over half the season (9 games) and played in each one. You cant compare that with those you listed

» Redskins and Panthers trade (Approved)
» panthers and colts(approved)
» panthers and viks(approved)
» panthers and rams (approved)
» panthers and falcons(APPROVED)