| Jags and Giants (cancelled) | |
|
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
daddie71 Guest
| Subject: Jags and Giants (cancelled) 7/2/2007, 8:06 pm | |
| Giants get David Garrard
Jags Reggie Torbor #34 (rookie)
I agree |
|
| |
rmanrun21
Number of posts : 40 Registration date : 2007-06-26
| Subject: Re: Jags and Giants (cancelled) 7/2/2007, 8:07 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
SoxNats0 Guest
| Subject: Re: Jags and Giants (cancelled) 7/2/2007, 8:08 pm | |
| Hmm, i dont know about this one. Garrard will be an 84 QB in my opinion... does #34 and a 73 make up for that? |
|
| |
daddie71 Guest
| Subject: Re: Jags and Giants (cancelled) 7/2/2007, 8:09 pm | |
| torbor will be higher, he is a starter now. |
|
| |
SoxNats0 Guest
| Subject: Re: Jags and Giants (cancelled) 7/2/2007, 8:09 pm | |
| - daddie7120 wrote:
- torbor will be higher, he is a starter now.
he had 29 tackles and 1 sack. Thats 76 at best. Not to mention QB is the most important position. |
|
| |
rmanrun21
Number of posts : 40 Registration date : 2007-06-26
| Subject: Re: Jags and Giants (cancelled) 7/2/2007, 8:11 pm | |
| with th34 the pick you can get a starter at any position and i need a QB badly | |
|
| |
Silvabil Guest
| Subject: Re: Jags and Giants (cancelled) 7/2/2007, 8:11 pm | |
| i like like it...34 is consider really a late first rounder cause lots of times people drop from there and torber is a pretty good linebacker that has potetial since he is still young |
|
| |
SoxNats0 Guest
| Subject: Re: Jags and Giants (cancelled) 7/2/2007, 8:11 pm | |
| - rmanrun21 wrote:
- with th34 the pick you can get a starter at any position and i need a QB badly
you have kitna dude. Kitna will be like 87-89. |
|
| |
rmanrun21
Number of posts : 40 Registration date : 2007-06-26
| Subject: Re: Jags and Giants (cancelled) 7/2/2007, 8:12 pm | |
| kitna was like a 79 or 80 last year. | |
|
| |
SoxNats0 Guest
| Subject: Re: Jags and Giants (cancelled) 7/2/2007, 8:12 pm | |
| - rmanrun21 wrote:
- kitna was like a 79 or 80 last year.
yeah but he had a sick year.... he was 82 |
|
| |
Silvabil Guest
| Subject: Re: Jags and Giants (cancelled) 7/2/2007, 8:15 pm | |
| kitna rating will rise after the year he had.....prob to an 87-89 range |
|
| |
Touchdow Guest
| Subject: Re: Jags and Giants (cancelled) 7/2/2007, 8:15 pm | |
| and apparently im booty licker... |
|
| |
Silvabil Guest
| Subject: Re: Jags and Giants (cancelled) 7/2/2007, 8:16 pm | |
| lmfao zoom.....booty booty booty rocking everywhere |
|
| |
rmanrun21
Number of posts : 40 Registration date : 2007-06-26
| Subject: Re: Jags and Giants (cancelled) 7/2/2007, 8:19 pm | |
| fine if h will be that high i dont want to do this trade. | |
|
| |
SoxNats0 Guest
| Subject: Re: Jags and Giants (cancelled) 7/2/2007, 8:20 pm | |
| - rmanrun21 wrote:
- fine if h will be that high i dont want to do this trade.
ok |
|
| |
SoxNats0 Guest
| Subject: Re: Jags and Giants (cancelled) 7/2/2007, 8:21 pm | |
| By the way Rmanrun go over to baseball league for a min and say u agree to our trade |
|
| |
Touchdow Guest
| Subject: Re: Jags and Giants (cancelled) 7/2/2007, 8:29 pm | |
| dont lock this up yet SoxNats, your the only one who has disagreed with it so far it seems. |
|
| |
Silvabil Guest
| Subject: Re: Jags and Giants (cancelled) 7/2/2007, 8:30 pm | |
| - rmanrun21 wrote:
- fine if h will be that high i dont want to do this trade.
that's why it's rejected |
|
| |
Touchdow Guest
| Subject: Re: Jags and Giants (cancelled) 7/2/2007, 8:31 pm | |
| he didnt let daddie say anything though and it was locked up before he had a chance to, he pmd me with a complaint against it |
|
| |
Silvabil Guest
| Subject: Re: Jags and Giants (cancelled) 7/2/2007, 8:32 pm | |
| |
|
| |
daddie71 Guest
| Subject: Re: Jags and Giants (cancelled) 7/2/2007, 8:33 pm | |
| Hey soxs as a mod you are to moderate trades not participate. Who is the gm making the deal here? Do you want garrard or what? Why dont you just do your job and leave the trades up to the participants. thanks. |
|
| |
Silvabil Guest
| Subject: Re: Jags and Giants (cancelled) 7/2/2007, 8:34 pm | |
| man he's new to this daddie....lighten up |
|
| |
Touchdow Guest
| Subject: Re: Jags and Giants (cancelled) 7/2/2007, 8:35 pm | |
| I actually thought it wasnt really an offensive comment except for the use of continuos questions, just my two cents |
|
| |
daddie71 Guest
| Subject: Re: Jags and Giants (cancelled) 7/2/2007, 8:38 pm | |
| I dont mind him helping explain a trade but he and you agree that kitna is way better so basically dont trade. Kitna led the league in turnovers you think that will show up in his rating and in the games... how about the fact that the lions threw like 65% of the time and had no rushing attack last year? That 4000 yards is garbage in my book kitna will be 86 at very best. |
|
| |
Silvabil Guest
| Subject: Re: Jags and Giants (cancelled) 7/2/2007, 8:42 pm | |
| we are to give input....we are sorry about this bud please i bet he didn't mean to ruin your deal |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Jags and Giants (cancelled) | |
| |
|
| |
| Jags and Giants (cancelled) | |
|