| | bears and rams (approved) |  |
|
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
daBEARS
Guest
| | Subject: bears and rams (approved) 6/24/2007, 11:15 pm | |
| bears get: steven jackson
rams: cedric benson, nathan vasher, pick 31
agree |
|
| | |
Emmitt22
Guest
| | Subject: Re: bears and rams (approved) 6/24/2007, 11:18 pm | |
|
Last edited by on 6/24/2007, 11:24 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| | |
SoxNats0
Guest
| | Subject: Re: bears and rams (approved) 6/24/2007, 11:18 pm | |
| i know you hate complaining titans, but isnt this a bit much for steven jackson? |
|
| | |
daBEARS
Guest
| | Subject: Re: bears and rams (approved) 6/24/2007, 11:19 pm | |
| |
|
| | |
nieemo
Number of posts : 226
Registration date : 2007-06-21
| | Subject: Re: bears and rams (approved) 6/24/2007, 11:20 pm | |
| i think sox should add something | |
|
| | |
coolman4721
Number of posts : 135
Registration date : 2007-06-24
| | Subject: Re: bears and rams (approved) 6/24/2007, 11:21 pm | |
|
Last edited by on 6/24/2007, 11:23 pm; edited 1 time in total | |
|
| | |
daBEARS
Guest
| | Subject: Re: bears and rams (approved) 6/24/2007, 11:21 pm | |
| |
|
| | |
nieemo
Number of posts : 226
Registration date : 2007-06-21
| | Subject: Re: bears and rams (approved) 6/24/2007, 11:21 pm | |
| | |
|
| | |
cav_fan2
Number of posts : 115
Age : 42
Location : Huntington, WV
Registration date : 2007-06-22
| | Subject: Re: bears and rams (approved) 6/24/2007, 11:25 pm | |
| I dont think so...this deal is definitely fair...Jackson could be the best back by seasons end and be ranked in the high, high 90's...he will probably be in the low-mid 90's when 08 comes out...
This is fair value for Jackson IMO...Benson is still a project back...
One mod is voting yes to this deal...I'll let someone else approve this one though | |
|
| | |
Touchdow
Guest
| | Subject: Re: bears and rams (approved) 6/24/2007, 11:28 pm | |
| I like this trade to, the first rounders late and like cav said Benson is still a project back. While Jackson is a 93-95 overall player whos not only young but he has dreads. |
|
| | |
daBEARS
Guest
| | Subject: Re: bears and rams (approved) 6/24/2007, 11:29 pm | |
| i had 37. too whatever u guys think is better |
|
| | |
cav_fan2
Number of posts : 115
Age : 42
Location : Huntington, WV
Registration date : 2007-06-22
| | Subject: Re: bears and rams (approved) 6/24/2007, 11:31 pm | |
| - lebronzoom wrote:
- I like this trade to, the first rounders late and like cav said Benson is still a project back. While Jackson is a 93-95 overall player whos not only young but he has dreads.
Classic!! I think this is one of those trades that you cant really compare the positions in the deal...I know Vasher is a good corner, but its like comparing apples and oranges... A pro-bowl RB in Madden is much better than a pretty good corner and a decent RB IMO... Pick #31 really has no factor in this, since this is a one year league...that pick will probably just be a depth player anyway...so this deal is good...if you agree Lebron, I will approve and lock it | |
|
| | |
Touchdow
Guest
| | Subject: Re: bears and rams (approved) 6/24/2007, 11:33 pm | |
| approve it, this deal is fine in my eyes |
|
| | |
SoxNats0
Guest
| | Subject: Re: bears and rams (approved) 6/24/2007, 11:34 pm | |
| - cav_fan2 wrote:
- lebronzoom wrote:
- I like this trade to, the first rounders late and like cav said Benson is still a project back. While Jackson is a 93-95 overall player whos not only young but he has dreads.
Classic!!
I think this is one of those trades that you cant really compare the positions in the deal...I know Vasher is a good corner, but its like comparing apples and oranges...
A pro-bowl RB in Madden is much better than a pretty good corner and a decent RB IMO...
Pick #31 really has no factor in this, since this is a one year league...that pick will probably just be a depth player anyway...so this deal is good...if you agree Lebron, I will approve and lock it This is a one year league? i thought it was more than 1, otherwise picks are pointless. also, u should wait for one more mod |
|
| | |
Touchdow
Guest
| | Subject: Re: bears and rams (approved) 6/24/2007, 11:34 pm | |
| I also think this should be more than one year, theres no reason why it should be. |
|
| | |
Sponsored content
| | Subject: Re: bears and rams (approved) | |
| |
|
| | |
| | bears and rams (approved) | |
|
