POLL ON TRADE COUNCIL

wats the joke?

dreamteam wrote:

lebronzoom wrote:

yea thats good but im not sure if everyone will vote. There should be a cut-off time for it

the cut off time right now is 7 days lol

i dont get it ...............

footballnerd85 wrote:

dreamteam wrote:

lebronzoom wrote:

yea thats good but im not sure if everyone will vote. There should be a cut-off time for it

the cut off time right now is 7 days lol

i dont get it ...............

this poll will end in 7 days

why did he say lol at the end? and sox do u understand the system?

footballnerd85 wrote:

why did he say lol at the end? and sox do u understand the system?

sorta... not really. i want to change my vote though, how do i do that?

I dont think you can

well IMO the system is fine as it is, i just think that it should be harder to cancel a trade.

SoxNats07 wrote:

well IMO the system is fine as it is, i just think that it should be harder to cancel a trade.

and the new system would do just that

dreamteam wrote:

SoxNats07 wrote:

well IMO the system is fine as it is, i just think that it should be harder to cancel a trade.

and the new system would do just that

how?

SoxNats07 wrote:

dreamteam wrote:

SoxNats07 wrote:

well IMO the system is fine as it is, i just think that it should be harder to cancel a trade.

and the new system would do just that

how?

because it eliminates the power of ONE individual to cancel a trade.. eg. if 5 people say a trade is fair and just say Drew comes in and says NO. this is not fair, then the trade will have to be looked over again. In the new system, one individual cannot come in and say NO. because it would take a majority.. it also simplifies things alot

dreamteam wrote:

SoxNats07 wrote:

dreamteam wrote:

SoxNats07 wrote:

well IMO the system is fine as it is, i just think that it should be harder to cancel a trade.

and the new system would do just that

how?

because it eliminates the power of ONE individual to cancel a trade.. eg. if 5 people say a trade is fair and just say Drew comes in and says NO. this is not fair, then the trade will have to be looked over again. In the new system, one individual cannot come in and say NO. because it would take a majority.. it also simplifies things alot

but wouldnt it take forever for EVERYONE on the trade council to vote? this doesnt seem simpler

SoxNats07 wrote:

but wouldnt it take forever for EVERYONE on the trade council to vote? this doesnt seem simpler

not realli if we pick people who are on all the time and say we have a 3 member trade council it shouldnt take long at all

dreamteam wrote:

SoxNats07 wrote:

but wouldnt it take forever for EVERYONE on the trade council to vote? this doesnt seem simpler

not realli if we pick people who are on all the time and say we have a 3 member trade council it shouldnt take long at all

what is wrong with the current system though? i think we should just stick to the same system, but it would take two mods to cancel a trade instead of one.

SoxNats07 wrote:

dreamteam wrote:

SoxNats07 wrote:

but wouldnt it take forever for EVERYONE on the trade council to vote? this doesnt seem simpler

not realli if we pick people who are on all the time and say we have a 3 member trade council it shouldnt take long at all

what is wrong with the current system though? i think we should just stick to the same system, but it would take two mods to cancel a trade instead of one.

can you explain to me the current system..because i believe there is no system right now

dreamteam wrote:

SoxNats07 wrote:

dreamteam wrote:

SoxNats07 wrote:

but wouldnt it take forever for EVERYONE on the trade council to vote? this doesnt seem simpler

not realli if we pick people who are on all the time and say we have a 3 member trade council it shouldnt take long at all

what is wrong with the current system though? i think we should just stick to the same system, but it would take two mods to cancel a trade instead of one.

can you explain to me the current system..because i believe there is no system right now

A trade happens, and if one mod approves it , it goes through. but if one disagrees, we should wait for another.

how bout wen u approve a trade, lebron agree, cavs agrees than drew says No. its not fair.. what kind of system is that?

dreamteam wrote:

SoxNats07 wrote:

dreamteam wrote:

SoxNats07 wrote:

well IMO the system is fine as it is, i just think that it should be harder to cancel a trade.

and the new system would do just that

how?

because it eliminates the power of ONE individual to cancel a trade.. eg. if 5 people say a trade is fair and just say Drew comes in and says NO. this is not fair, then the trade will have to be looked over again. In the new system, one individual cannot come in and say NO. because it would take a majority.. it also simplifies things alot

Ok. I seriously don't understanfd this BS. This whole idea is dumb as heck. Dreamteam you need to understand one thing and one thing now. It doesnt matter what system you want in place. If Yan and I don't agree on the fairness. But whatever dude. Dream your taking your tyraid a little to far dude.

DC wrote:

dreamteam wrote:

SoxNats07 wrote:

dreamteam wrote:

SoxNats07 wrote:

well IMO the system is fine as it is, i just think that it should be harder to cancel a trade.

and the new system would do just that

how?

because it eliminates the power of ONE individual to cancel a trade.. eg. if 5 people say a trade is fair and just say Drew comes in and says NO. this is not fair, then the trade will have to be looked over again. In the new system, one individual cannot come in and say NO. because it would take a majority.. it also simplifies things alot

Ok. I seriously don't understanfd this BS. This whole idea is dumb as heck. Dreamteam you need to understand one thing and one thing now. It doesnt matter what system you want in place. If Yan and I don't agree on the fairness. But whatever dude. Dream your taking your tyraid a little to far dude.

Drew im not on a tyraid, if you think im the only one who feels that ther needs to be a new system in place, you should look at the poll

Werent we just voting on whether or not we should vote whos on the trade council?

no, its whether the enitre system shud be changed.

the whole system? u should have said this earlier.... they should remake the poll

Its right in the title of the poll....

look at the poll topic before you submit!

Should there be a system where there is an odd number of council people who vote on if a trade should be passed?

footballnerd85 wrote:

look at the poll topic before you submit!

Should there be a system where there is an odd number of council people who vote on if a trade should be passed?

yeah i thought it was just the current council votes on trades, not a whole new system.

no, we are gonna get a new group of mods, who vote on every trade to make it passed.